Siggy gives you a signing record you — and your clients — can independently verify: real consent, a tamper-evident seal, an unbroken audit trail and a certificate. Here is exactly how it works, and exactly what we do and don't claim.
The Act, mapped to the product
New to the Act? Start with how the Electronic Transactions Act applies to everyday documents.
Before any signature, the signer is shown an electronic-signing consent notice and must explicitly agree. Declining records the choice and signs nothing.
Each signer reaches the document through a unique, single-use tokenised link sent to their email. They affirm their intention to be bound before submitting, and their IP address and UTC timestamps are recorded.
The completed PDF is sealed with a PAdES digital signature. A single altered byte invalidates the seal — so the signed record is demonstrably the one the parties saw.
Every event is written to an append-only, hash-chained audit trail and summarised in a Certificate of Completion delivered to all parties. Any tampering breaks the chain on verification.
The technical guarantees
Each audit event embeds the hash of the one before it. Re-ordering, editing or deleting any event is detectable — verification fails loudly.
On completion the document is cryptographically sealed. The seal covers the exact signed bytes; alteration is mathematically detectable.
We hash the original PDF the moment it is uploaded and the sealed PDF on completion, so the chain of custody is provable end-to-end.
An auto-generated certificate lists every recipient, their consent and signing times, IP addresses and the audit trail — independently of any single document.
Hosted in Australia. Your documents and your clients' details never leave infrastructure you can name to your own clients.
Your signers are never tracked, profiled or advertised to — the signing experience, identity verification and the signed-in app carry no analytics of any kind. We use Google Analytics on our public marketing pages only; see our privacy policy.
What we don't claim
Trust is earned by being precise about limits, not by overstating them. So, plainly:
Where Siggy is strong